Hands-on Lab·Kubernetes and Cloud Native Security Associate
Privilege Escalation from Pod to Node
The most important idea in the KCSA threat model is that `create pods` is a privilege escalation primitive. This guide grants a ServiceAccount nothing but Pod creation, proves it cannot read Secrets, and then reads one through the node instead - before making the same grant useless with a namespace label.
Kubernetes Threat Model Guide 29 of 42 Advanced
- Kubernetesapiserver v1.36.4, kubelet v1.36.3
- Runtimecontainerd 2.2.6
- CNICilium 1.18.1 - tunnel/VXLAN, with Hubble relay and UI
- Host OSUbuntu 26.04 LTS, kernel 7.0.0-29
- Built withkubeadm v1.36.3 - podSubnet 10.244.0.0/16, serviceSubnet 10.96.0.0/12
- TimeAbout 20 min
- Reviewed25 August 2026
Written against the versions above. The escalation uses `hostPath` with `path: /`, which `baseline` Pod Security forbids. Nothing here is a vulnerability - every step is a documented field used as designed.
| Server Name | IP Address | OS | Roles | CPU | RAM | HDD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CKA5001 | 192.168.0.41 | Ubuntu 26.04 LTS | Control Plane Node (tainted NoSchedule) | 2 Core | 4 GB | 50 GB |
| CKA5001-NODE01 | 192.168.0.42 | Ubuntu 26.04 LTS | Worker Node | 2 Core | 4 GB | 50 GB |
| CKA5001-NODE02 | 192.168.0.43 | Ubuntu 26.04 LTS | Worker Node | 2 Core | 4 GB | 50 GB |
| CKA5001-NODE03 | 192.168.0.44 | Ubuntu 26.04 LTS | Worker Node | 2 Core | 4 GB | 50 GB |
Before you start
-
A ServiceAccount that may create Pods and may not read Secrets
-
A victim Secret, mounted by somebody else's Pod
-
The escalation: one Pod, created as the deployer
-
What it found on the node
-
The control that ends it, in one label